{"id":780,"date":"2026-06-30T15:09:29","date_gmt":"2026-06-30T15:09:29","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/blueroutejournal.com\/?p=780"},"modified":"2026-06-30T15:09:29","modified_gmt":"2026-06-30T15:09:29","slug":"supreme-court-rules-against-trump-in-birthright-citizenship-case","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/blueroutejournal.com\/?p=780","title":{"rendered":"Supreme Court Rules Against Trump In Birthright Citizenship Case"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n
\n

The U.S. Supreme Court on Tuesday permanently blocked President Donald Trump\u2019s executive order seeking to restrict birthright citizenship, dealing a significant blow to his immigration agenda and preventing a sweeping overhaul of who qualifies for U.S. citizenship.<\/p>\n

Read more Supreme Court Protects Women\u2019s Sports In Landmark Ruling<\/a><\/p>\n

authored by Chief Justice John Roberts, the Supreme Court held that children born in the United States to parents unlawfully or temporarily present are \u201csubject to the jurisdiction\u201d of the United States and are citizens at birth under the Fourteenth Amendment\u2019s Citizenship Clause.<\/p>\n

\u201cCitizenship, then and now, was the right to have rights \u2014 to freely participate in our political community. The Framers of the Fourteenth Amendment extended that promise to \u2018every free-born person in this land,’\u201d Roberts wrote. \u201cWe keep that promise today.\u201d<\/p>\n

Justice Brett Kavanaugh concurred in part and dissented in part. He disagreed with the court\u2019s holding that Trump\u2019s executive order violated the Fourteenth Amendment to the Constitution. Instead, he argued that the order violated other federal statutes, saying only Congress can enact new exceptions to birthright citizenship for children born to illegal immigrants.<\/p>\n

Justices Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito, and Neil Gorsuch dissented.<\/span><\/p>\n

\u201cThe Court has repurposed the Fourteenth Amendment to protect its own set of preferred rights that the Reconstruction Congress never contemplated and that cannot find support in its text,\u201d Thomas wrote. \u201cToday, the Court does so again by recognizing a constitutional right to citizenship for the children of all foreign birth tourists and illegal aliens.\u201d<\/p>\n

Tuesday\u2019s ruling ends a dramatic legal saga and campaign promise that could\u2019ve redefined who qualifies for U.S. citizenship ahead of the country\u2019s 250th anniversary. On his first day back in office, President Trump signed the long-promised order, which faced immediate legal challenges and was never implemented. The White House has argued that children born to illegal immigrants or to parents with temporary legal status, such as tourists or foreign students, are not \u201csubject to the jurisdiction\u201d of the United States and not entitled to automatic citizenship.<\/span><\/p>\n

\u201cThe United States of America cannot live with the shackles of Birthright Citizenship. It is not economically, or otherwise, sustainable, and no other Country in the World, of consequence, does it,\u201d Trump said in a June 11 Truth Social post.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n

Those challenging Trump\u2019s order agreed that \u201csubject to the jurisdiction thereof\u201d sets up limited exceptions for children of foreign diplomats and babies born to enemies during an invasion. Ratified in 1868, three years after the end of the Civil War, the 14th Amendment was adopted in part to guarantee citizenship for formerly enslaved people and their descendants.<\/span><\/p>\n

Read more How A Detransitioner\u2019s Legal Win Marks \u2018Watershed Moment\u2019 For Victims Of Gender Procedures<\/a><\/p>\n

During oral arguments in April, which Trump attended, the three liberal justices quickly signaled their opposition to the executive order, and Chief Justice John Roberts, along with conservative Justices Brett Kavanaugh and Amy Coney Barrett, expressed some skepticism about the administration\u2019s historical arguments.<\/span><\/p>\n

Roberts expressed confusion about some of the Trump administration\u2019s arguments, telling Solicitor General John Sauer that he was relying on \u201cvery quirky\u201d exceptions to birthright citizenship.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n

The Chief Justice also pushed back on Sauer after raising the issue of birth tourism, arguing, \u201cIt\u2019s a new world where eight billion people are a plane ride away from having a child who\u2019s a U.S. citizen.\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n

\u201cWell, it\u2019s a new world; it\u2019s the same Constitution,\u201d <\/span>the Chief Justice replied<\/span>.<\/p>\n

Last week, White House Deputy Chief of Staff Stephen Miller previewed the potential consequences of continuing birthright citizenship.<\/p>\n

\u201cIf this country doesn\u2019t, one way or another, end birthright citizenship, this country doesn\u2019t have a future,\u201d Miller said. \u201cCitizenship has to be sacred and precious.\u201d\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n

\u201cAnd as we stand here on the 250th anniversary of America\u2019s founding, the idea that we wouldn\u2019t have in this country respect and sanctity for citizenship for the voting franchise is such an insult to generations of Americans who spilled their blood for our freedom,\u201d he added.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n

Read more Trump Team Arrives In Doha As Direct Iran Talks Appear Off The Table<\/a><\/p>\n

This is a breaking story. Stay with The Daily Wire for updates. <\/span><\/i><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

The U.S. Supreme Court on Tuesday permanently blocked President Donald Trump\u2019s executive order seeking to restrict birthright citizenship, dealing a significant blow to his immigration agenda and preventing a sweeping overhaul of who qualifies for U.S. citizenship.In a landmark 5-4 ruling authored by Chief Justice John Roberts, the Supreme Court held that children born in the United States to parents unlawfully or temporarily present are \u201csubject to the jurisdiction\u201d of the United States and are citizens at birth under the Fourteenth Amendment\u2019s Citizenship Clause.\u201cCitizenship, then and now, was the right to have rights \u2014 to freely participate in our political community. The Framers of the Fourteenth Amendment extended that promise to \u2018every free-born person in this land,'\u201d Roberts wrote. \u201cWe keep that promise today.\u201dJustice Brett Kavanaugh concurred in part and dissented in part. He disagreed with the court\u2019s holding that Trump\u2019s executive order violated the Fourteenth Amendment to the Constitution. Instead, he argued that the order violated other federal statutes, saying only Congress can enact new exceptions to birthright citizenship for children born to illegal immigrants.Justices Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito, and Neil Gorsuch dissented.\u201cThe Court has repurposed the Fourteenth Amendment to protect its own set of preferred rights that the Reconstruction Congress never contemplated and that cannot find support in its text,\u201d Thomas wrote. \u201cToday, the Court does so again by recognizing a constitutional right to citizenship for the children of all foreign birth tourists and illegal aliens.\u201dTuesday\u2019s ruling ends a dramatic legal saga and campaign promise that could\u2019ve redefined who qualifies for U.S. citizenship ahead of the country\u2019s 250th anniversary. On his first day back in office, President Trump signed the long-promised order, which faced immediate legal challenges and was never implemented. The White House has argued that children born to illegal immigrants or to parents with temporary legal status, such as tourists or foreign students, are not \u201csubject to the jurisdiction\u201d of the United States and not entitled to automatic citizenship.\u201cThe United States of America cannot live with the shackles of Birthright Citizenship. It is not economically, or otherwise, sustainable, and no other Country in the World, of consequence, does it,\u201d Trump said in a June 11 Truth Social post.\u00a0Those challenging Trump\u2019s order agreed that \u201csubject to the jurisdiction thereof\u201d sets up limited exceptions for children of foreign diplomats and babies born to enemies during an invasion. Ratified in 1868, three years after the end of the Civil War, the 14th Amendment was adopted in part to guarantee citizenship for formerly enslaved people and their descendants.During oral arguments in April, which Trump attended, the three liberal justices quickly signaled their opposition to the executive order, and Chief Justice John Roberts, along with conservative Justices Brett Kavanaugh and Amy Coney Barrett, expressed some skepticism about the administration\u2019s historical arguments.Roberts expressed confusion about some of the Trump administration\u2019s arguments, telling Solicitor General John Sauer that he was relying on \u201cvery quirky\u201d exceptions to birthright citizenship.\u00a0The Chief Justice also pushed back on Sauer after raising the issue of birth tourism, arguing, \u201cIt\u2019s a new world where eight billion people are a plane ride away from having a child who\u2019s a U.S. citizen.\u201d\u201cWell, it\u2019s a new world; it\u2019s the same Constitution,\u201d the Chief Justice replied.Last week, White House Deputy Chief of Staff Stephen Miller previewed the potential consequences of continuing birthright citizenship.\u201cIf this country doesn\u2019t, one way or another, end birthright citizenship, this country doesn\u2019t have a future,\u201d Miller said. \u201cCitizenship has to be sacred and precious.\u201d\u00a0\u201cAnd as we stand here on the 250th anniversary of America\u2019s founding, the idea that we wouldn\u2019t have in this country respect and sanctity for citizenship for the voting franchise is such an insult to generations of Americans who spilled their blood for our freedom,\u201d he added.\u00a0This is a breaking story. Stay with The Daily Wire for updates. <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":779,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[3],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-780","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-news-2"],"yoast_head":"\nSupreme Court Rules Against Trump In Birthright Citizenship Case - Blue Route Journal<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/blueroutejournal.com\/?p=780\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Supreme Court Rules Against Trump In Birthright Citizenship Case - Blue Route Journal\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"The U.S. Supreme Court on Tuesday permanently blocked President Donald Trump\u2019s executive order seeking to restrict birthright citizenship, dealing a significant blow to his immigration agenda and preventing a sweeping overhaul of who qualifies for U.S. citizenship.In a landmark 5-4 ruling authored by Chief Justice John Roberts, the Supreme Court held that children born in the United States to parents unlawfully or temporarily present are \u201csubject to the jurisdiction\u201d of the United States and are citizens at birth under the Fourteenth Amendment\u2019s Citizenship Clause.\u201cCitizenship, then and now, was the right to have rights \u2014 to freely participate in our political community. The Framers of the Fourteenth Amendment extended that promise to \u2018every free-born person in this land,&apos;\u201d Roberts wrote. \u201cWe keep that promise today.\u201dJustice Brett Kavanaugh concurred in part and dissented in part. He disagreed with the court\u2019s holding that Trump\u2019s executive order violated the Fourteenth Amendment to the Constitution. Instead, he argued that the order violated other federal statutes, saying only Congress can enact new exceptions to birthright citizenship for children born to illegal immigrants.Justices Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito, and Neil Gorsuch dissented.\u201cThe Court has repurposed the Fourteenth Amendment to protect its own set of preferred rights that the Reconstruction Congress never contemplated and that cannot find support in its text,\u201d Thomas wrote. \u201cToday, the Court does so again by recognizing a constitutional right to citizenship for the children of all foreign birth tourists and illegal aliens.\u201dTuesday\u2019s ruling ends a dramatic legal saga and campaign promise that could\u2019ve redefined who qualifies for U.S. citizenship ahead of the country\u2019s 250th anniversary. On his first day back in office, President Trump signed the long-promised order, which faced immediate legal challenges and was never implemented. The White House has argued that children born to illegal immigrants or to parents with temporary legal status, such as tourists or foreign students, are not \u201csubject to the jurisdiction\u201d of the United States and not entitled to automatic citizenship.\u201cThe United States of America cannot live with the shackles of Birthright Citizenship. It is not economically, or otherwise, sustainable, and no other Country in the World, of consequence, does it,\u201d Trump said in a June 11 Truth Social post.\u00a0Those challenging Trump\u2019s order agreed that \u201csubject to the jurisdiction thereof\u201d sets up limited exceptions for children of foreign diplomats and babies born to enemies during an invasion. Ratified in 1868, three years after the end of the Civil War, the 14th Amendment was adopted in part to guarantee citizenship for formerly enslaved people and their descendants.During oral arguments in April, which Trump attended, the three liberal justices quickly signaled their opposition to the executive order, and Chief Justice John Roberts, along with conservative Justices Brett Kavanaugh and Amy Coney Barrett, expressed some skepticism about the administration\u2019s historical arguments.Roberts expressed confusion about some of the Trump administration\u2019s arguments, telling Solicitor General John Sauer that he was relying on \u201cvery quirky\u201d exceptions to birthright citizenship.\u00a0The Chief Justice also pushed back on Sauer after raising the issue of birth tourism, arguing, \u201cIt\u2019s a new world where eight billion people are a plane ride away from having a child who\u2019s a U.S. citizen.\u201d\u201cWell, it\u2019s a new world; it\u2019s the same Constitution,\u201d the Chief Justice replied.Last week, White House Deputy Chief of Staff Stephen Miller previewed the potential consequences of continuing birthright citizenship.\u201cIf this country doesn\u2019t, one way or another, end birthright citizenship, this country doesn\u2019t have a future,\u201d Miller said. \u201cCitizenship has to be sacred and precious.\u201d\u00a0\u201cAnd as we stand here on the 250th anniversary of America\u2019s founding, the idea that we wouldn\u2019t have in this country respect and sanctity for citizenship for the voting franchise is such an insult to generations of Americans who spilled their blood for our freedom,\u201d he added.\u00a0This is a breaking story. Stay with The Daily Wire for updates.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/blueroutejournal.com\/?p=780\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Blue Route Journal\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2026-06-30T15:09:29+00:00\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blueroutejournal.com\\\/?p=780#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blueroutejournal.com\\\/?p=780\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blueroutejournal.com\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/19da116f8d79cf8987781569801c6b7c\"},\"headline\":\"Supreme Court Rules Against Trump In Birthright Citizenship Case\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-06-30T15:09:29+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blueroutejournal.com\\\/?p=780\"},\"wordCount\":713,\"commentCount\":0,\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blueroutejournal.com\\\/?p=780#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blueroutejournal.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/06\\\/6dbbb79afaa2614c871c3c6e27b5e766.avif\",\"articleSection\":[\"News\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/blueroutejournal.com\\\/?p=780#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blueroutejournal.com\\\/?p=780\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blueroutejournal.com\\\/?p=780\",\"name\":\"Supreme Court Rules Against Trump In Birthright Citizenship Case - Blue Route Journal\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blueroutejournal.com\\\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blueroutejournal.com\\\/?p=780#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blueroutejournal.com\\\/?p=780#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blueroutejournal.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/06\\\/6dbbb79afaa2614c871c3c6e27b5e766.avif\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-06-30T15:09:29+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blueroutejournal.com\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/19da116f8d79cf8987781569801c6b7c\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blueroutejournal.com\\\/?p=780#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/blueroutejournal.com\\\/?p=780\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blueroutejournal.com\\\/?p=780#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blueroutejournal.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/06\\\/6dbbb79afaa2614c871c3c6e27b5e766.avif\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blueroutejournal.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/06\\\/6dbbb79afaa2614c871c3c6e27b5e766.avif\",\"width\":1200,\"height\":675},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blueroutejournal.com\\\/?p=780#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blueroutejournal.com\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Supreme Court Rules Against Trump In Birthright Citizenship Case\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blueroutejournal.com\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blueroutejournal.com\\\/\",\"name\":\"Blue Route Journal\",\"description\":\"\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blueroutejournal.com\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blueroutejournal.com\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/19da116f8d79cf8987781569801c6b7c\",\"name\":\"admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/50b1ad2e498f523425ee0a8cc5180a210646db1622662a3d56cc405d3e0c346a?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/50b1ad2e498f523425ee0a8cc5180a210646db1622662a3d56cc405d3e0c346a?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/50b1ad2e498f523425ee0a8cc5180a210646db1622662a3d56cc405d3e0c346a?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"http:\\\/\\\/blueroutejournal.com\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blueroutejournal.com\\\/?author=1\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Supreme Court Rules Against Trump In Birthright Citizenship Case - Blue Route Journal","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/blueroutejournal.com\/?p=780","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Supreme Court Rules Against Trump In Birthright Citizenship Case - Blue Route Journal","og_description":"The U.S. Supreme Court on Tuesday permanently blocked President Donald Trump\u2019s executive order seeking to restrict birthright citizenship, dealing a significant blow to his immigration agenda and preventing a sweeping overhaul of who qualifies for U.S. citizenship.In a landmark 5-4 ruling authored by Chief Justice John Roberts, the Supreme Court held that children born in the United States to parents unlawfully or temporarily present are \u201csubject to the jurisdiction\u201d of the United States and are citizens at birth under the Fourteenth Amendment\u2019s Citizenship Clause.\u201cCitizenship, then and now, was the right to have rights \u2014 to freely participate in our political community. The Framers of the Fourteenth Amendment extended that promise to \u2018every free-born person in this land,'\u201d Roberts wrote. \u201cWe keep that promise today.\u201dJustice Brett Kavanaugh concurred in part and dissented in part. He disagreed with the court\u2019s holding that Trump\u2019s executive order violated the Fourteenth Amendment to the Constitution. Instead, he argued that the order violated other federal statutes, saying only Congress can enact new exceptions to birthright citizenship for children born to illegal immigrants.Justices Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito, and Neil Gorsuch dissented.\u201cThe Court has repurposed the Fourteenth Amendment to protect its own set of preferred rights that the Reconstruction Congress never contemplated and that cannot find support in its text,\u201d Thomas wrote. \u201cToday, the Court does so again by recognizing a constitutional right to citizenship for the children of all foreign birth tourists and illegal aliens.\u201dTuesday\u2019s ruling ends a dramatic legal saga and campaign promise that could\u2019ve redefined who qualifies for U.S. citizenship ahead of the country\u2019s 250th anniversary. On his first day back in office, President Trump signed the long-promised order, which faced immediate legal challenges and was never implemented. The White House has argued that children born to illegal immigrants or to parents with temporary legal status, such as tourists or foreign students, are not \u201csubject to the jurisdiction\u201d of the United States and not entitled to automatic citizenship.\u201cThe United States of America cannot live with the shackles of Birthright Citizenship. It is not economically, or otherwise, sustainable, and no other Country in the World, of consequence, does it,\u201d Trump said in a June 11 Truth Social post.\u00a0Those challenging Trump\u2019s order agreed that \u201csubject to the jurisdiction thereof\u201d sets up limited exceptions for children of foreign diplomats and babies born to enemies during an invasion. Ratified in 1868, three years after the end of the Civil War, the 14th Amendment was adopted in part to guarantee citizenship for formerly enslaved people and their descendants.During oral arguments in April, which Trump attended, the three liberal justices quickly signaled their opposition to the executive order, and Chief Justice John Roberts, along with conservative Justices Brett Kavanaugh and Amy Coney Barrett, expressed some skepticism about the administration\u2019s historical arguments.Roberts expressed confusion about some of the Trump administration\u2019s arguments, telling Solicitor General John Sauer that he was relying on \u201cvery quirky\u201d exceptions to birthright citizenship.\u00a0The Chief Justice also pushed back on Sauer after raising the issue of birth tourism, arguing, \u201cIt\u2019s a new world where eight billion people are a plane ride away from having a child who\u2019s a U.S. citizen.\u201d\u201cWell, it\u2019s a new world; it\u2019s the same Constitution,\u201d the Chief Justice replied.Last week, White House Deputy Chief of Staff Stephen Miller previewed the potential consequences of continuing birthright citizenship.\u201cIf this country doesn\u2019t, one way or another, end birthright citizenship, this country doesn\u2019t have a future,\u201d Miller said. \u201cCitizenship has to be sacred and precious.\u201d\u00a0\u201cAnd as we stand here on the 250th anniversary of America\u2019s founding, the idea that we wouldn\u2019t have in this country respect and sanctity for citizenship for the voting franchise is such an insult to generations of Americans who spilled their blood for our freedom,\u201d he added.\u00a0This is a breaking story. Stay with The Daily Wire for updates.","og_url":"https:\/\/blueroutejournal.com\/?p=780","og_site_name":"Blue Route Journal","article_published_time":"2026-06-30T15:09:29+00:00","author":"admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"admin","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/blueroutejournal.com\/?p=780#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/blueroutejournal.com\/?p=780"},"author":{"name":"admin","@id":"https:\/\/blueroutejournal.com\/#\/schema\/person\/19da116f8d79cf8987781569801c6b7c"},"headline":"Supreme Court Rules Against Trump In Birthright Citizenship Case","datePublished":"2026-06-30T15:09:29+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/blueroutejournal.com\/?p=780"},"wordCount":713,"commentCount":0,"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/blueroutejournal.com\/?p=780#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/blueroutejournal.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/06\/6dbbb79afaa2614c871c3c6e27b5e766.avif","articleSection":["News"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/blueroutejournal.com\/?p=780#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/blueroutejournal.com\/?p=780","url":"https:\/\/blueroutejournal.com\/?p=780","name":"Supreme Court Rules Against Trump In Birthright Citizenship Case - Blue Route Journal","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/blueroutejournal.com\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/blueroutejournal.com\/?p=780#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/blueroutejournal.com\/?p=780#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/blueroutejournal.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/06\/6dbbb79afaa2614c871c3c6e27b5e766.avif","datePublished":"2026-06-30T15:09:29+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/blueroutejournal.com\/#\/schema\/person\/19da116f8d79cf8987781569801c6b7c"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/blueroutejournal.com\/?p=780#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/blueroutejournal.com\/?p=780"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/blueroutejournal.com\/?p=780#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/blueroutejournal.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/06\/6dbbb79afaa2614c871c3c6e27b5e766.avif","contentUrl":"https:\/\/blueroutejournal.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/06\/6dbbb79afaa2614c871c3c6e27b5e766.avif","width":1200,"height":675},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/blueroutejournal.com\/?p=780#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/blueroutejournal.com\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Supreme Court Rules Against Trump In Birthright Citizenship Case"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/blueroutejournal.com\/#website","url":"https:\/\/blueroutejournal.com\/","name":"Blue Route Journal","description":"","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/blueroutejournal.com\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/blueroutejournal.com\/#\/schema\/person\/19da116f8d79cf8987781569801c6b7c","name":"admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/50b1ad2e498f523425ee0a8cc5180a210646db1622662a3d56cc405d3e0c346a?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/50b1ad2e498f523425ee0a8cc5180a210646db1622662a3d56cc405d3e0c346a?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/50b1ad2e498f523425ee0a8cc5180a210646db1622662a3d56cc405d3e0c346a?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"admin"},"sameAs":["http:\/\/blueroutejournal.com"],"url":"https:\/\/blueroutejournal.com\/?author=1"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/blueroutejournal.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/780","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/blueroutejournal.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/blueroutejournal.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blueroutejournal.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blueroutejournal.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=780"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/blueroutejournal.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/780\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blueroutejournal.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/779"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/blueroutejournal.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=780"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blueroutejournal.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=780"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blueroutejournal.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=780"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}