{"id":778,"date":"2026-06-30T14:38:39","date_gmt":"2026-06-30T14:38:39","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/blueroutejournal.com\/?p=778"},"modified":"2026-06-30T14:38:39","modified_gmt":"2026-06-30T14:38:39","slug":"supreme-court-protects-womens-sports-in-landmark-ruling","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/blueroutejournal.com\/?p=778","title":{"rendered":"Supreme Court Protects Women\u2019s Sports In Landmark Ruling\u00a0"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n
\n

The U.S. Supreme Court on Tuesday ruled that states have the constitutional power to ban men from women\u2019s sports, dealing another blow to the transgender movement.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n

Read more How A Detransitioner\u2019s Legal Win Marks \u2018Watershed Moment\u2019 For Victims Of Gender Procedures<\/a><\/p>\n

In an apparent authored by Justice Brett Kavanaugh and joined by the other conservative justices, the Supreme Court held that Title IX \u00a0allows schools to determine eligibility for women\u2019s and girls\u2019 sports teams based on biological sex.<\/p>\n

\u201cThey may determine eligibility for women\u2019s and girls\u2019 sports based on biological sex,\u201d Justice Kavanaugh wrote. \u201cThe Constitution and Title IX do not require an overhaul of women\u2019s and girls\u2019 sports throughout America.\u201d<\/p>\n

The landmark decision centered on laws passed by Idaho and West Virginia restricting transgender athletes from competing in female athletics. <\/span>More than half the country<\/span> has enacted similar laws to protect female sports and locker rooms. The justices upheld those bans and left for another day the question of whether Title IX requires states to prohibit transgender athletes from competing against women.<\/span><\/p>\n

Tuesday\u2019s ruling is also a win for the Trump administration, which issued an <\/span>executive order<\/span> in February 2025 directing the federal government to strip funding from schools that allow transgender students to compete in female athletics, calling the practice \u201cdemeaning, unfair, and dangerous to women and girls.\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n

Liberal Justice Sonia Sotomayor and\u00a0<\/span>Ketanji Brown Jackson agreed with parts of the majority opinion and dissented on other parts, while Justices Elena Kagan also dissented.<\/p>\n

It\u2019s a crushing blow for transgender athletes and liberal activists, who chose to take the fight to the Supreme Court, arguing that Idaho and West Virginia\u2019s policies discriminated based on sex and transgender status.\u00a0<\/span>In January, the justices heard two different sets of oral arguments in the cases of <\/span>West Virginia v. B.P.J.<\/span><\/i> and <\/span>Little v. Hecox<\/span><\/i>.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n

Idaho\u2019s 2020 law, known as the Fairness in Women\u2019s Sports Act, was the first of its kind in the country, according to <\/span>SCOTUSblog<\/span>. It bans transgender students from competing on girls\u2019 and women\u2019s school sports teams, from elementary through college.<\/span><\/p>\n

Read more Trump Team Arrives In Doha As Direct Iran Talks Appear Off The Table<\/a><\/p>\n

The West Virginia law, the Save Women\u2019s Sports Act, was enacted in 2021. It bars transgender individuals from competing on women\u2019s and girls\u2019 sports teams in public secondary schools and colleges, according to <\/span>SCOTUSblog<\/span>.<\/p>\n

Ahead of oral arguments, Republican officials and <\/span>prominent female athletes like Riley Gaines held a press conference, saying the Supreme Court case would have far-reaching consequences for women\u2019s privacy and safety, <\/span>The Daily Wire<\/span> reported.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n

\u201cThe reason that we are here is because Idaho and West Virginia passed common-sense laws that delineate the athletic playing fields in our states between the sexes,\u201d said West Virginia Attorney General John McCuskey.<\/span><\/p>\n

Gaines, the University of Kentucky swimmer who rose to national prominence for speaking out after being forced to compete against male University of Pennsylvania swimmer Lia Thomas, said she was \u201cpissed\u201d off that the country had reached the point where it was even a debate whether women can have their own sports teams.<\/span><\/p>\n

\u201cI\u2019m pissed off that we\u2019ve reached a point where we seemingly have an entire political party who has diminished and erased our rights as women. That\u2019s exactly what this is. Don\u2019t let them frame it any other way,\u201d Gaines said.<\/span><\/p>\n

The Supreme Court\u2019s ruling stops short of requiring states to separate sports teams by sex \u2014 it simply allows them to do so.<\/p>\n

\u201cWe are fighting for the bare minimum here,\u201d Gaines said. \u201cCan we allow ourselves to be vulnerable in an intimate area of undressing, such as a locker room, without having to fear a man walking into that space? Can we do those things?\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n

Read more Republicans Draw Up Game Plan To Address \u2018Shockingly Wrong\u2019 SCOTUS Ruling<\/a><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

The U.S. Supreme Court on Tuesday ruled that states have the constitutional power to ban men from women\u2019s sports, dealing another blow to the transgender movement.\u00a0In an apparent 6-3 ruling authored by Justice Brett Kavanaugh and joined by the other conservative justices, the Supreme Court held that Title IX \u00a0allows schools to determine eligibility for women\u2019s and girls\u2019 sports teams based on biological sex.\u201cThey may determine eligibility for women\u2019s and girls\u2019 sports based on biological sex,\u201d Justice Kavanaugh wrote. \u201cThe Constitution and Title IX do not require an overhaul of women\u2019s and girls\u2019 sports throughout America.\u201dThe landmark decision centered on laws passed by Idaho and West Virginia restricting transgender athletes from competing in female athletics. More than half the country has enacted similar laws to protect female sports and locker rooms. The justices upheld those bans and left for another day the question of whether Title IX requires states to prohibit transgender athletes from competing against women.Tuesday\u2019s ruling is also a win for the Trump administration, which issued an executive order in February 2025 directing the federal government to strip funding from schools that allow transgender students to compete in female athletics, calling the practice \u201cdemeaning, unfair, and dangerous to women and girls.\u201dLiberal Justice Sonia Sotomayor and\u00a0Ketanji Brown Jackson agreed with parts of the majority opinion and dissented on other parts, while Justices Elena Kagan also dissented.It\u2019s a crushing blow for transgender athletes and liberal activists, who chose to take the fight to the Supreme Court, arguing that Idaho and West Virginia\u2019s policies discriminated based on sex and transgender status.\u00a0In January, the justices heard two different sets of oral arguments in the cases of West Virginia v. B.P.J. and Little v. Hecox.\u00a0Idaho\u2019s 2020 law, known as the Fairness in Women\u2019s Sports Act, was the first of its kind in the country, according to SCOTUSblog. It bans transgender students from competing on girls\u2019 and women\u2019s school sports teams, from elementary through college.The West Virginia law, the Save Women\u2019s Sports Act, was enacted in 2021. It bars transgender individuals from competing on women\u2019s and girls\u2019 sports teams in public secondary schools and colleges, according to SCOTUSblog.Ahead of oral arguments, Republican officials and prominent female athletes like Riley Gaines held a press conference, saying the Supreme Court case would have far-reaching consequences for women\u2019s privacy and safety, The Daily Wire reported.\u00a0\u201cThe reason that we are here is because Idaho and West Virginia passed common-sense laws that delineate the athletic playing fields in our states between the sexes,\u201d said West Virginia Attorney General John McCuskey.Gaines, the University of Kentucky swimmer who rose to national prominence for speaking out after being forced to compete against male University of Pennsylvania swimmer Lia Thomas, said she was \u201cpissed\u201d off that the country had reached the point where it was even a debate whether women can have their own sports teams.\u201cI\u2019m pissed off that we\u2019ve reached a point where we seemingly have an entire political party who has diminished and erased our rights as women. That\u2019s exactly what this is. Don\u2019t let them frame it any other way,\u201d Gaines said.The Supreme Court\u2019s ruling stops short of requiring states to separate sports teams by sex \u2014 it simply allows them to do so.\u201cWe are fighting for the bare minimum here,\u201d Gaines said. \u201cCan we allow ourselves to be vulnerable in an intimate area of undressing, such as a locker room, without having to fear a man walking into that space? Can we do those things?\u201d<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":777,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[3],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-778","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-news-2"],"yoast_head":"\nSupreme Court Protects Women\u2019s Sports In Landmark Ruling\u00a0 - Blue Route Journal<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/blueroutejournal.com\/?p=778\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Supreme Court Protects Women\u2019s Sports In Landmark Ruling\u00a0 - Blue Route Journal\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"The U.S. Supreme Court on Tuesday ruled that states have the constitutional power to ban men from women\u2019s sports, dealing another blow to the transgender movement.\u00a0In an apparent 6-3 ruling authored by Justice Brett Kavanaugh and joined by the other conservative justices, the Supreme Court held that Title IX \u00a0allows schools to determine eligibility for women\u2019s and girls\u2019 sports teams based on biological sex.\u201cThey may determine eligibility for women\u2019s and girls\u2019 sports based on biological sex,\u201d Justice Kavanaugh wrote. \u201cThe Constitution and Title IX do not require an overhaul of women\u2019s and girls\u2019 sports throughout America.\u201dThe landmark decision centered on laws passed by Idaho and West Virginia restricting transgender athletes from competing in female athletics. More than half the country has enacted similar laws to protect female sports and locker rooms. The justices upheld those bans and left for another day the question of whether Title IX requires states to prohibit transgender athletes from competing against women.Tuesday\u2019s ruling is also a win for the Trump administration, which issued an executive order in February 2025 directing the federal government to strip funding from schools that allow transgender students to compete in female athletics, calling the practice \u201cdemeaning, unfair, and dangerous to women and girls.\u201dLiberal Justice Sonia Sotomayor and\u00a0Ketanji Brown Jackson agreed with parts of the majority opinion and dissented on other parts, while Justices Elena Kagan also dissented.It\u2019s a crushing blow for transgender athletes and liberal activists, who chose to take the fight to the Supreme Court, arguing that Idaho and West Virginia\u2019s policies discriminated based on sex and transgender status.\u00a0In January, the justices heard two different sets of oral arguments in the cases of West Virginia v. B.P.J. and Little v. Hecox.\u00a0Idaho\u2019s 2020 law, known as the Fairness in Women\u2019s Sports Act, was the first of its kind in the country, according to SCOTUSblog. It bans transgender students from competing on girls\u2019 and women\u2019s school sports teams, from elementary through college.The West Virginia law, the Save Women\u2019s Sports Act, was enacted in 2021. It bars transgender individuals from competing on women\u2019s and girls\u2019 sports teams in public secondary schools and colleges, according to SCOTUSblog.Ahead of oral arguments, Republican officials and prominent female athletes like Riley Gaines held a press conference, saying the Supreme Court case would have far-reaching consequences for women\u2019s privacy and safety, The Daily Wire reported.\u00a0\u201cThe reason that we are here is because Idaho and West Virginia passed common-sense laws that delineate the athletic playing fields in our states between the sexes,\u201d said West Virginia Attorney General John McCuskey.Gaines, the University of Kentucky swimmer who rose to national prominence for speaking out after being forced to compete against male University of Pennsylvania swimmer Lia Thomas, said she was \u201cpissed\u201d off that the country had reached the point where it was even a debate whether women can have their own sports teams.\u201cI\u2019m pissed off that we\u2019ve reached a point where we seemingly have an entire political party who has diminished and erased our rights as women. That\u2019s exactly what this is. Don\u2019t let them frame it any other way,\u201d Gaines said.The Supreme Court\u2019s ruling stops short of requiring states to separate sports teams by sex \u2014 it simply allows them to do so.\u201cWe are fighting for the bare minimum here,\u201d Gaines said. \u201cCan we allow ourselves to be vulnerable in an intimate area of undressing, such as a locker room, without having to fear a man walking into that space? Can we do those things?\u201d\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/blueroutejournal.com\/?p=778\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Blue Route Journal\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2026-06-30T14:38:39+00:00\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blueroutejournal.com\\\/?p=778#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blueroutejournal.com\\\/?p=778\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blueroutejournal.com\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/19da116f8d79cf8987781569801c6b7c\"},\"headline\":\"Supreme Court Protects Women\u2019s Sports In Landmark Ruling\u00a0\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-06-30T14:38:39+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blueroutejournal.com\\\/?p=778\"},\"wordCount\":660,\"commentCount\":0,\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blueroutejournal.com\\\/?p=778#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blueroutejournal.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/06\\\/4d2af7fd953d03d13e19821dafbff41c.avif\",\"articleSection\":[\"News\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/blueroutejournal.com\\\/?p=778#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blueroutejournal.com\\\/?p=778\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blueroutejournal.com\\\/?p=778\",\"name\":\"Supreme Court Protects Women\u2019s Sports In Landmark Ruling\u00a0 - Blue Route Journal\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blueroutejournal.com\\\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blueroutejournal.com\\\/?p=778#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blueroutejournal.com\\\/?p=778#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blueroutejournal.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/06\\\/4d2af7fd953d03d13e19821dafbff41c.avif\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-06-30T14:38:39+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blueroutejournal.com\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/19da116f8d79cf8987781569801c6b7c\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blueroutejournal.com\\\/?p=778#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/blueroutejournal.com\\\/?p=778\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blueroutejournal.com\\\/?p=778#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blueroutejournal.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/06\\\/4d2af7fd953d03d13e19821dafbff41c.avif\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blueroutejournal.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/06\\\/4d2af7fd953d03d13e19821dafbff41c.avif\",\"width\":1200,\"height\":675},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blueroutejournal.com\\\/?p=778#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blueroutejournal.com\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Supreme Court Protects Women\u2019s Sports In Landmark Ruling\u00a0\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blueroutejournal.com\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blueroutejournal.com\\\/\",\"name\":\"Blue Route Journal\",\"description\":\"\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blueroutejournal.com\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blueroutejournal.com\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/19da116f8d79cf8987781569801c6b7c\",\"name\":\"admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/50b1ad2e498f523425ee0a8cc5180a210646db1622662a3d56cc405d3e0c346a?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/50b1ad2e498f523425ee0a8cc5180a210646db1622662a3d56cc405d3e0c346a?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/50b1ad2e498f523425ee0a8cc5180a210646db1622662a3d56cc405d3e0c346a?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"http:\\\/\\\/blueroutejournal.com\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blueroutejournal.com\\\/?author=1\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Supreme Court Protects Women\u2019s Sports In Landmark Ruling\u00a0 - Blue Route Journal","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/blueroutejournal.com\/?p=778","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Supreme Court Protects Women\u2019s Sports In Landmark Ruling\u00a0 - Blue Route Journal","og_description":"The U.S. Supreme Court on Tuesday ruled that states have the constitutional power to ban men from women\u2019s sports, dealing another blow to the transgender movement.\u00a0In an apparent 6-3 ruling authored by Justice Brett Kavanaugh and joined by the other conservative justices, the Supreme Court held that Title IX \u00a0allows schools to determine eligibility for women\u2019s and girls\u2019 sports teams based on biological sex.\u201cThey may determine eligibility for women\u2019s and girls\u2019 sports based on biological sex,\u201d Justice Kavanaugh wrote. \u201cThe Constitution and Title IX do not require an overhaul of women\u2019s and girls\u2019 sports throughout America.\u201dThe landmark decision centered on laws passed by Idaho and West Virginia restricting transgender athletes from competing in female athletics. More than half the country has enacted similar laws to protect female sports and locker rooms. The justices upheld those bans and left for another day the question of whether Title IX requires states to prohibit transgender athletes from competing against women.Tuesday\u2019s ruling is also a win for the Trump administration, which issued an executive order in February 2025 directing the federal government to strip funding from schools that allow transgender students to compete in female athletics, calling the practice \u201cdemeaning, unfair, and dangerous to women and girls.\u201dLiberal Justice Sonia Sotomayor and\u00a0Ketanji Brown Jackson agreed with parts of the majority opinion and dissented on other parts, while Justices Elena Kagan also dissented.It\u2019s a crushing blow for transgender athletes and liberal activists, who chose to take the fight to the Supreme Court, arguing that Idaho and West Virginia\u2019s policies discriminated based on sex and transgender status.\u00a0In January, the justices heard two different sets of oral arguments in the cases of West Virginia v. B.P.J. and Little v. Hecox.\u00a0Idaho\u2019s 2020 law, known as the Fairness in Women\u2019s Sports Act, was the first of its kind in the country, according to SCOTUSblog. It bans transgender students from competing on girls\u2019 and women\u2019s school sports teams, from elementary through college.The West Virginia law, the Save Women\u2019s Sports Act, was enacted in 2021. It bars transgender individuals from competing on women\u2019s and girls\u2019 sports teams in public secondary schools and colleges, according to SCOTUSblog.Ahead of oral arguments, Republican officials and prominent female athletes like Riley Gaines held a press conference, saying the Supreme Court case would have far-reaching consequences for women\u2019s privacy and safety, The Daily Wire reported.\u00a0\u201cThe reason that we are here is because Idaho and West Virginia passed common-sense laws that delineate the athletic playing fields in our states between the sexes,\u201d said West Virginia Attorney General John McCuskey.Gaines, the University of Kentucky swimmer who rose to national prominence for speaking out after being forced to compete against male University of Pennsylvania swimmer Lia Thomas, said she was \u201cpissed\u201d off that the country had reached the point where it was even a debate whether women can have their own sports teams.\u201cI\u2019m pissed off that we\u2019ve reached a point where we seemingly have an entire political party who has diminished and erased our rights as women. That\u2019s exactly what this is. Don\u2019t let them frame it any other way,\u201d Gaines said.The Supreme Court\u2019s ruling stops short of requiring states to separate sports teams by sex \u2014 it simply allows them to do so.\u201cWe are fighting for the bare minimum here,\u201d Gaines said. \u201cCan we allow ourselves to be vulnerable in an intimate area of undressing, such as a locker room, without having to fear a man walking into that space? Can we do those things?\u201d","og_url":"https:\/\/blueroutejournal.com\/?p=778","og_site_name":"Blue Route Journal","article_published_time":"2026-06-30T14:38:39+00:00","author":"admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"admin","Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/blueroutejournal.com\/?p=778#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/blueroutejournal.com\/?p=778"},"author":{"name":"admin","@id":"https:\/\/blueroutejournal.com\/#\/schema\/person\/19da116f8d79cf8987781569801c6b7c"},"headline":"Supreme Court Protects Women\u2019s Sports In Landmark Ruling\u00a0","datePublished":"2026-06-30T14:38:39+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/blueroutejournal.com\/?p=778"},"wordCount":660,"commentCount":0,"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/blueroutejournal.com\/?p=778#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/blueroutejournal.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/06\/4d2af7fd953d03d13e19821dafbff41c.avif","articleSection":["News"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/blueroutejournal.com\/?p=778#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/blueroutejournal.com\/?p=778","url":"https:\/\/blueroutejournal.com\/?p=778","name":"Supreme Court Protects Women\u2019s Sports In Landmark Ruling\u00a0 - Blue Route Journal","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/blueroutejournal.com\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/blueroutejournal.com\/?p=778#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/blueroutejournal.com\/?p=778#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/blueroutejournal.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/06\/4d2af7fd953d03d13e19821dafbff41c.avif","datePublished":"2026-06-30T14:38:39+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/blueroutejournal.com\/#\/schema\/person\/19da116f8d79cf8987781569801c6b7c"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/blueroutejournal.com\/?p=778#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/blueroutejournal.com\/?p=778"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/blueroutejournal.com\/?p=778#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/blueroutejournal.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/06\/4d2af7fd953d03d13e19821dafbff41c.avif","contentUrl":"https:\/\/blueroutejournal.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/06\/4d2af7fd953d03d13e19821dafbff41c.avif","width":1200,"height":675},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/blueroutejournal.com\/?p=778#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/blueroutejournal.com\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Supreme Court Protects Women\u2019s Sports In Landmark Ruling\u00a0"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/blueroutejournal.com\/#website","url":"https:\/\/blueroutejournal.com\/","name":"Blue Route Journal","description":"","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/blueroutejournal.com\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/blueroutejournal.com\/#\/schema\/person\/19da116f8d79cf8987781569801c6b7c","name":"admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/50b1ad2e498f523425ee0a8cc5180a210646db1622662a3d56cc405d3e0c346a?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/50b1ad2e498f523425ee0a8cc5180a210646db1622662a3d56cc405d3e0c346a?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/50b1ad2e498f523425ee0a8cc5180a210646db1622662a3d56cc405d3e0c346a?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"admin"},"sameAs":["http:\/\/blueroutejournal.com"],"url":"https:\/\/blueroutejournal.com\/?author=1"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/blueroutejournal.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/778","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/blueroutejournal.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/blueroutejournal.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blueroutejournal.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blueroutejournal.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=778"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/blueroutejournal.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/778\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blueroutejournal.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/777"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/blueroutejournal.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=778"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blueroutejournal.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=778"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blueroutejournal.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=778"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}