{"id":627,"date":"2026-06-25T17:40:17","date_gmt":"2026-06-25T17:40:17","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/blueroutejournal.com\/?p=627"},"modified":"2026-06-25T17:40:17","modified_gmt":"2026-06-25T17:40:17","slug":"supreme-court-strikes-down-vampire-rule-in-major-win-for-gun-rights","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/blueroutejournal.com\/?p=627","title":{"rendered":"Supreme Court Strikes Down \u2018Vampire Rule\u2019 In Major Win For Gun Rights"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n
\n

The Supreme Court handed gun-rights advocates a major victory Thursday, striking down Hawaii\u2019s controversial \u201cvampire rule\u201d that effectively banned lawful concealed carry on most private property unless owners explicitly granted permission.<\/span><\/p>\n

Read more SEE IT: \u2018Baywatch\u2019 Is The Latest Victim Of California\u2019s Homeless Crisis<\/a><\/p>\n

In a 6-3 decision split along ideological lines, the court ruled that Hawaii\u2019s law violated the Second Amendment, with Justice Samuel Alito writing for the conservative majority.<\/span><\/p>\n

The law struck down by the court created a default rule prohibiting concealed carry permit holders from bringing firearms onto private property open to the public unless the property owner affirmatively authorized firearms or posted signage allowing them. The measure effectively transformed vast swaths of public life into gun-free zones and forced lawful gun owners to obtain permission before exercising their constitutional right.<\/span><\/p>\n

The law was dubbed the \u201cvampire rule\u201d by Second Amendment advocates based on classic lore that describes how vampires only enter someone\u2019s home if they\u2019re invited.<\/p>\n

The case, Wolford v. Lopez<\/em>, became one of the most closely watched Second Amendment disputes since the Court\u2019s landmark 2022 decision in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. Bruen<\/em>, which established that modern firearms regulations must be consistent with the nation\u2019s historical tradition of gun laws.<\/span><\/p>\n

The National Rifle Association quickly hailed the ruling as a major step forward for gun rights. <\/span><\/p>\n

\u201cToday, the United States Supreme Court delivered a major victory for the Second Amendment in Wolford v. Lopez<\/em>,\u201d NRA Institute for Legislative Action Executive Director John Commerford said in a statement.<\/span><\/p>\n

\u201cBuilding on the NRA\u2019s historic NYSRPA v. Bruen decision<\/em>, the court struck down Hawaii\u2019s unconstitutional restriction that treated concealed carry permit holders as second-class citizens on publicly accessible private property. Law-abiding gun owners will no longer be forced to beg for special permission simply to exercise their constitutional right to bear arms in public places.\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n

Read more Judge In Hot Seat After COVID Insanity Claim Clears Mom Who Drowned Her Baby<\/a><\/p>\n

Commerford added that the organization views the ruling as part of a broader effort to restore Second Amendment protections nationwide. <\/span>\u201cThe NRA celebrates this important win, but it is only another steppingstone in our unrelenting fight to fully restore the Second Amendment rights of all Americans nationwide,\u201d he said.<\/span><\/p>\n

The court\u2019s liberal justices dissented. Justice Elena Kagan argued that Hawaii\u2019s law closely resembled colonial and founding-era regulations that restricted carrying firearms onto private property without a landowner\u2019s consent. \u201cI would uphold the challenged Hawaii law,\u201d Kagan , arguing that the modern statute was a valid analogue to historical restrictions.<\/span><\/p>\n

According to Kagan, both the historical laws and Hawaii\u2019s modern law operated in the same way by establishing a default prohibition that property owners could reverse. <\/span><\/p>\n

\u201cThe \u2018how\u2019 is identical,\u201d she wrote. \u201cThe new law, just like the old ones, sets a default rule against gun carry that a private landowner may reverse.\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n

Kagan further argued that while some colonial-era laws were focused on concerns such as poaching, they were rooted in the broader principle that armed individuals could create dangers and inconveniences on another person\u2019s property.<\/span><\/p>\n

The majority disagreed, concluding that Hawaii\u2019s law lacked a sufficiently analogous historical tradition and imposed an unconstitutional burden on lawful gun owners seeking to exercise their Second Amendment rights. The ruling is expected to have implications beyond Hawaii, as several states enacted similar post-Bruen<\/em> restrictions designed to limit where concealed carry permit holders could legally carry firearms.<\/span><\/p>\n

The decision marks another significant victory for gun-rights advocates and continues the Supreme Court\u2019s effort to apply the history-and-tradition test established in Bruen<\/em> to modern firearms regulations.<\/span><\/p>\n

Read more Another MLB Team Announces \u2018Pride Night\u2019 Game, Features Drag Queen Performer<\/a><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

The Supreme Court handed gun-rights advocates a major victory Thursday, striking down Hawaii\u2019s controversial \u201cvampire rule\u201d that effectively banned lawful concealed carry on most private property unless owners explicitly granted permission.In a 6-3 decision split along ideological lines, the court ruled that Hawaii\u2019s law violated the Second Amendment, with Justice Samuel Alito writing for the conservative majority.The law struck down by the court created a default rule prohibiting concealed carry permit holders from bringing firearms onto private property open to the public unless the property owner affirmatively authorized firearms or posted signage allowing them. The measure effectively transformed vast swaths of public life into gun-free zones and forced lawful gun owners to obtain permission before exercising their constitutional right.The law was dubbed the \u201cvampire rule\u201d by Second Amendment advocates based on classic lore that describes how vampires only enter someone\u2019s home if they\u2019re invited.The case, Wolford v. Lopez, became one of the most closely watched Second Amendment disputes since the Court\u2019s landmark 2022 decision in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. Bruen, which established that modern firearms regulations must be consistent with the nation\u2019s historical tradition of gun laws.The National Rifle Association quickly hailed the ruling as a major step forward for gun rights. \u201cToday, the United States Supreme Court delivered a major victory for the Second Amendment in Wolford v. Lopez,\u201d NRA Institute for Legislative Action Executive Director John Commerford said in a statement.\u201cBuilding on the NRA\u2019s historic NYSRPA v. Bruen decision, the court struck down Hawaii\u2019s unconstitutional restriction that treated concealed carry permit holders as second-class citizens on publicly accessible private property. Law-abiding gun owners will no longer be forced to beg for special permission simply to exercise their constitutional right to bear arms in public places.\u201dCommerford added that the organization views the ruling as part of a broader effort to restore Second Amendment protections nationwide. \u201cThe NRA celebrates this important win, but it is only another steppingstone in our unrelenting fight to fully restore the Second Amendment rights of all Americans nationwide,\u201d he said.The court\u2019s liberal justices dissented. Justice Elena Kagan argued that Hawaii\u2019s law closely resembled colonial and founding-era regulations that restricted carrying firearms onto private property without a landowner\u2019s consent. \u201cI would uphold the challenged Hawaii law,\u201d Kagan wrote, arguing that the modern statute was a valid analogue to historical restrictions.According to Kagan, both the historical laws and Hawaii\u2019s modern law operated in the same way by establishing a default prohibition that property owners could reverse. \u201cThe \u2018how\u2019 is identical,\u201d she wrote. \u201cThe new law, just like the old ones, sets a default rule against gun carry that a private landowner may reverse.\u201dKagan further argued that while some colonial-era laws were focused on concerns such as poaching, they were rooted in the broader principle that armed individuals could create dangers and inconveniences on another person\u2019s property.The majority disagreed, concluding that Hawaii\u2019s law lacked a sufficiently analogous historical tradition and imposed an unconstitutional burden on lawful gun owners seeking to exercise their Second Amendment rights. The ruling is expected to have implications beyond Hawaii, as several states enacted similar post-Bruen restrictions designed to limit where concealed carry permit holders could legally carry firearms.The decision marks another significant victory for gun-rights advocates and continues the Supreme Court\u2019s effort to apply the history-and-tradition test established in Bruen to modern firearms regulations.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":626,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[11],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-627","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-news-and-analysis"],"yoast_head":"\nSupreme Court Strikes Down \u2018Vampire Rule\u2019 In Major Win For Gun Rights - Blue Route Journal<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/blueroutejournal.com\/?p=627\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Supreme Court Strikes Down \u2018Vampire Rule\u2019 In Major Win For Gun Rights - Blue Route Journal\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"The Supreme Court handed gun-rights advocates a major victory Thursday, striking down Hawaii\u2019s controversial \u201cvampire rule\u201d that effectively banned lawful concealed carry on most private property unless owners explicitly granted permission.In a 6-3 decision split along ideological lines, the court ruled that Hawaii\u2019s law violated the Second Amendment, with Justice Samuel Alito writing for the conservative majority.The law struck down by the court created a default rule prohibiting concealed carry permit holders from bringing firearms onto private property open to the public unless the property owner affirmatively authorized firearms or posted signage allowing them. The measure effectively transformed vast swaths of public life into gun-free zones and forced lawful gun owners to obtain permission before exercising their constitutional right.The law was dubbed the \u201cvampire rule\u201d by Second Amendment advocates based on classic lore that describes how vampires only enter someone\u2019s home if they\u2019re invited.The case, Wolford v. Lopez, became one of the most closely watched Second Amendment disputes since the Court\u2019s landmark 2022 decision in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. Bruen, which established that modern firearms regulations must be consistent with the nation\u2019s historical tradition of gun laws.The National Rifle Association quickly hailed the ruling as a major step forward for gun rights. \u201cToday, the United States Supreme Court delivered a major victory for the Second Amendment in Wolford v. Lopez,\u201d NRA Institute for Legislative Action Executive Director John Commerford said in a statement.\u201cBuilding on the NRA\u2019s historic NYSRPA v. Bruen decision, the court struck down Hawaii\u2019s unconstitutional restriction that treated concealed carry permit holders as second-class citizens on publicly accessible private property. Law-abiding gun owners will no longer be forced to beg for special permission simply to exercise their constitutional right to bear arms in public places.\u201dCommerford added that the organization views the ruling as part of a broader effort to restore Second Amendment protections nationwide. \u201cThe NRA celebrates this important win, but it is only another steppingstone in our unrelenting fight to fully restore the Second Amendment rights of all Americans nationwide,\u201d he said.The court\u2019s liberal justices dissented. Justice Elena Kagan argued that Hawaii\u2019s law closely resembled colonial and founding-era regulations that restricted carrying firearms onto private property without a landowner\u2019s consent. \u201cI would uphold the challenged Hawaii law,\u201d Kagan wrote, arguing that the modern statute was a valid analogue to historical restrictions.According to Kagan, both the historical laws and Hawaii\u2019s modern law operated in the same way by establishing a default prohibition that property owners could reverse. \u201cThe \u2018how\u2019 is identical,\u201d she wrote. \u201cThe new law, just like the old ones, sets a default rule against gun carry that a private landowner may reverse.\u201dKagan further argued that while some colonial-era laws were focused on concerns such as poaching, they were rooted in the broader principle that armed individuals could create dangers and inconveniences on another person\u2019s property.The majority disagreed, concluding that Hawaii\u2019s law lacked a sufficiently analogous historical tradition and imposed an unconstitutional burden on lawful gun owners seeking to exercise their Second Amendment rights. The ruling is expected to have implications beyond Hawaii, as several states enacted similar post-Bruen restrictions designed to limit where concealed carry permit holders could legally carry firearms.The decision marks another significant victory for gun-rights advocates and continues the Supreme Court\u2019s effort to apply the history-and-tradition test established in Bruen to modern firearms regulations.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/blueroutejournal.com\/?p=627\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Blue Route Journal\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2026-06-25T17:40:17+00:00\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blueroutejournal.com\\\/?p=627#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blueroutejournal.com\\\/?p=627\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blueroutejournal.com\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/19da116f8d79cf8987781569801c6b7c\"},\"headline\":\"Supreme Court Strikes Down \u2018Vampire Rule\u2019 In Major Win For Gun Rights\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-06-25T17:40:17+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blueroutejournal.com\\\/?p=627\"},\"wordCount\":635,\"commentCount\":0,\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blueroutejournal.com\\\/?p=627#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blueroutejournal.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/06\\\/0f0c8f77e4cc1b113348c0bb33399d38.avif\",\"articleSection\":[\"News and Analysis\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/blueroutejournal.com\\\/?p=627#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blueroutejournal.com\\\/?p=627\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blueroutejournal.com\\\/?p=627\",\"name\":\"Supreme Court Strikes Down \u2018Vampire Rule\u2019 In Major Win For Gun Rights - Blue Route Journal\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blueroutejournal.com\\\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blueroutejournal.com\\\/?p=627#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blueroutejournal.com\\\/?p=627#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blueroutejournal.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/06\\\/0f0c8f77e4cc1b113348c0bb33399d38.avif\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-06-25T17:40:17+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blueroutejournal.com\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/19da116f8d79cf8987781569801c6b7c\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blueroutejournal.com\\\/?p=627#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/blueroutejournal.com\\\/?p=627\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blueroutejournal.com\\\/?p=627#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blueroutejournal.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/06\\\/0f0c8f77e4cc1b113348c0bb33399d38.avif\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blueroutejournal.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/06\\\/0f0c8f77e4cc1b113348c0bb33399d38.avif\",\"width\":1200,\"height\":675},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blueroutejournal.com\\\/?p=627#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blueroutejournal.com\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Supreme Court Strikes Down \u2018Vampire Rule\u2019 In Major Win For Gun Rights\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blueroutejournal.com\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blueroutejournal.com\\\/\",\"name\":\"Blue Route Journal\",\"description\":\"\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blueroutejournal.com\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blueroutejournal.com\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/19da116f8d79cf8987781569801c6b7c\",\"name\":\"admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/50b1ad2e498f523425ee0a8cc5180a210646db1622662a3d56cc405d3e0c346a?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/50b1ad2e498f523425ee0a8cc5180a210646db1622662a3d56cc405d3e0c346a?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/50b1ad2e498f523425ee0a8cc5180a210646db1622662a3d56cc405d3e0c346a?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"http:\\\/\\\/blueroutejournal.com\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blueroutejournal.com\\\/?author=1\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Supreme Court Strikes Down \u2018Vampire Rule\u2019 In Major Win For Gun Rights - Blue Route Journal","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/blueroutejournal.com\/?p=627","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Supreme Court Strikes Down \u2018Vampire Rule\u2019 In Major Win For Gun Rights - Blue Route Journal","og_description":"The Supreme Court handed gun-rights advocates a major victory Thursday, striking down Hawaii\u2019s controversial \u201cvampire rule\u201d that effectively banned lawful concealed carry on most private property unless owners explicitly granted permission.In a 6-3 decision split along ideological lines, the court ruled that Hawaii\u2019s law violated the Second Amendment, with Justice Samuel Alito writing for the conservative majority.The law struck down by the court created a default rule prohibiting concealed carry permit holders from bringing firearms onto private property open to the public unless the property owner affirmatively authorized firearms or posted signage allowing them. The measure effectively transformed vast swaths of public life into gun-free zones and forced lawful gun owners to obtain permission before exercising their constitutional right.The law was dubbed the \u201cvampire rule\u201d by Second Amendment advocates based on classic lore that describes how vampires only enter someone\u2019s home if they\u2019re invited.The case, Wolford v. Lopez, became one of the most closely watched Second Amendment disputes since the Court\u2019s landmark 2022 decision in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. Bruen, which established that modern firearms regulations must be consistent with the nation\u2019s historical tradition of gun laws.The National Rifle Association quickly hailed the ruling as a major step forward for gun rights. \u201cToday, the United States Supreme Court delivered a major victory for the Second Amendment in Wolford v. Lopez,\u201d NRA Institute for Legislative Action Executive Director John Commerford said in a statement.\u201cBuilding on the NRA\u2019s historic NYSRPA v. Bruen decision, the court struck down Hawaii\u2019s unconstitutional restriction that treated concealed carry permit holders as second-class citizens on publicly accessible private property. Law-abiding gun owners will no longer be forced to beg for special permission simply to exercise their constitutional right to bear arms in public places.\u201dCommerford added that the organization views the ruling as part of a broader effort to restore Second Amendment protections nationwide. \u201cThe NRA celebrates this important win, but it is only another steppingstone in our unrelenting fight to fully restore the Second Amendment rights of all Americans nationwide,\u201d he said.The court\u2019s liberal justices dissented. Justice Elena Kagan argued that Hawaii\u2019s law closely resembled colonial and founding-era regulations that restricted carrying firearms onto private property without a landowner\u2019s consent. \u201cI would uphold the challenged Hawaii law,\u201d Kagan wrote, arguing that the modern statute was a valid analogue to historical restrictions.According to Kagan, both the historical laws and Hawaii\u2019s modern law operated in the same way by establishing a default prohibition that property owners could reverse. \u201cThe \u2018how\u2019 is identical,\u201d she wrote. \u201cThe new law, just like the old ones, sets a default rule against gun carry that a private landowner may reverse.\u201dKagan further argued that while some colonial-era laws were focused on concerns such as poaching, they were rooted in the broader principle that armed individuals could create dangers and inconveniences on another person\u2019s property.The majority disagreed, concluding that Hawaii\u2019s law lacked a sufficiently analogous historical tradition and imposed an unconstitutional burden on lawful gun owners seeking to exercise their Second Amendment rights. The ruling is expected to have implications beyond Hawaii, as several states enacted similar post-Bruen restrictions designed to limit where concealed carry permit holders could legally carry firearms.The decision marks another significant victory for gun-rights advocates and continues the Supreme Court\u2019s effort to apply the history-and-tradition test established in Bruen to modern firearms regulations.","og_url":"https:\/\/blueroutejournal.com\/?p=627","og_site_name":"Blue Route Journal","article_published_time":"2026-06-25T17:40:17+00:00","author":"admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"admin","Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/blueroutejournal.com\/?p=627#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/blueroutejournal.com\/?p=627"},"author":{"name":"admin","@id":"https:\/\/blueroutejournal.com\/#\/schema\/person\/19da116f8d79cf8987781569801c6b7c"},"headline":"Supreme Court Strikes Down \u2018Vampire Rule\u2019 In Major Win For Gun Rights","datePublished":"2026-06-25T17:40:17+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/blueroutejournal.com\/?p=627"},"wordCount":635,"commentCount":0,"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/blueroutejournal.com\/?p=627#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/blueroutejournal.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/06\/0f0c8f77e4cc1b113348c0bb33399d38.avif","articleSection":["News and Analysis"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/blueroutejournal.com\/?p=627#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/blueroutejournal.com\/?p=627","url":"https:\/\/blueroutejournal.com\/?p=627","name":"Supreme Court Strikes Down \u2018Vampire Rule\u2019 In Major Win For Gun Rights - Blue Route Journal","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/blueroutejournal.com\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/blueroutejournal.com\/?p=627#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/blueroutejournal.com\/?p=627#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/blueroutejournal.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/06\/0f0c8f77e4cc1b113348c0bb33399d38.avif","datePublished":"2026-06-25T17:40:17+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/blueroutejournal.com\/#\/schema\/person\/19da116f8d79cf8987781569801c6b7c"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/blueroutejournal.com\/?p=627#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/blueroutejournal.com\/?p=627"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/blueroutejournal.com\/?p=627#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/blueroutejournal.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/06\/0f0c8f77e4cc1b113348c0bb33399d38.avif","contentUrl":"https:\/\/blueroutejournal.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/06\/0f0c8f77e4cc1b113348c0bb33399d38.avif","width":1200,"height":675},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/blueroutejournal.com\/?p=627#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/blueroutejournal.com\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Supreme Court Strikes Down \u2018Vampire Rule\u2019 In Major Win For Gun Rights"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/blueroutejournal.com\/#website","url":"https:\/\/blueroutejournal.com\/","name":"Blue Route Journal","description":"","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/blueroutejournal.com\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/blueroutejournal.com\/#\/schema\/person\/19da116f8d79cf8987781569801c6b7c","name":"admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/50b1ad2e498f523425ee0a8cc5180a210646db1622662a3d56cc405d3e0c346a?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/50b1ad2e498f523425ee0a8cc5180a210646db1622662a3d56cc405d3e0c346a?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/50b1ad2e498f523425ee0a8cc5180a210646db1622662a3d56cc405d3e0c346a?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"admin"},"sameAs":["http:\/\/blueroutejournal.com"],"url":"https:\/\/blueroutejournal.com\/?author=1"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/blueroutejournal.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/627","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/blueroutejournal.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/blueroutejournal.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blueroutejournal.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blueroutejournal.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=627"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/blueroutejournal.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/627\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blueroutejournal.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/626"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/blueroutejournal.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=627"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blueroutejournal.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=627"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blueroutejournal.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=627"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}