{"id":290,"date":"2026-06-14T19:39:41","date_gmt":"2026-06-14T19:39:41","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/blueroutejournal.com\/?p=290"},"modified":"2026-06-14T19:39:41","modified_gmt":"2026-06-14T19:39:41","slug":"the-flaw-in-a-professors-race-based-defense-of-karmelo-anthony","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/blueroutejournal.com\/?p=290","title":{"rendered":"The Flaw In A Professor\u2019s Race-Based Defense Of Karmelo Anthony"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n
\n

George Washington University law professor emerita W. Burlette Carter declared on Thursday that Karmelo Anthony was entitled to a new trial.<\/p>\n

Read more NYC Erupts In Violence After Knicks Win NBA Title For First Time In 53 Years<\/a><\/p>\n

Anthony, 19, was convicted of murder in the stabbing death of Austin Metcalf, 17, and sentenced to serve 35 years in prison. Carter argued that because \u201cminorities are not interchangeable,\u201d Anthony was not provided with \u201ca jury of his peers\u201d at trial \u2014 and she said that alone was grounds for him to receive a new trial.<\/p>\n

Carter, a black woman who describes herself on X as a \u201cdescendant of slaves,\u201d prefaced her statement by admitting that she had not yet read a full transcript of the trial \u2014 but then immediately argued that she didn\u2019t need to because it was already clear to her that Anthony had not been granted a fair trial.<\/p>\n

\u201cI have not yet read the full trial transcript. But so far, I do know this. Karmelo Anthony was entitled to a jury of his peers. He did not get that,\u201d she claimed. \u201cOn that ground alone, he is entitled to a new trial. Minorities are not interchangeable. The prosecutor\u2019s reported proffered reasons for striking all black jurors \u00a0\u2014 that they were teachers \u2014 appears to be pretext.\u201d<\/p>\n

But by law, a jury does not have to reflect the race of the defendant \u2014 rather, it must be made up of a reasonable cross section of the community, and both attorneys and judges are to do their best to ensure that the jury is made up of individuals who will decide the case based on the facts presented rather than preexisting biases.<\/p>\n

Read more Spencer Pratt Mocks Karen Bass As Report Reveals Action Her Brother Took Over Palisades Fire<\/a><\/p>\n

The jury in Anthony\u2019s case was made up of multiple ethnic minorities \u2014 in spite of claims made by Anthony\u2019s father and others that the jury was \u201call white\u201d \u2014 including Asian, Indian, and Hispanic. The prosecution did challenge several potential jurors who were black because they were educators and the murder had happened on school grounds. The judge accepted those challenges as valid.<\/p>\n

\u201cAnthony needs a new lawyer on appeal and in a new trial,\u201d Carter continued, arguing that Anthony\u2019s court-appointed attorney had not done a good job. She left out the fact that, after raising some $600,000 via GiveSendGo, Anthony\u2019s family had gone with a court-appointed lawyer after claiming that he was unable to afford a private attorney.<\/p>\n

\u201cHis trial lawyer allowed in opinion evidence that should have been struck. He also seemed unable to appreciate and counter the impact of racial overtones in that case. Those overtones are clear even on Twitter commentary as folks seek to paint Metcalf as having no culpability in what happened and Karmelo as a complete monster,\u201d she insisted. \u201cThe facts on how the matter escalated are more complicated than that. He and they had no such authority. They are also apparent in the statements that seek to deputize Metcalf and other kids with authority to remove Anthony. They had none and initiated the conflict. That does not mean they should have been killed but it means they have explaining to do. The lawyer for Anthony apparently did not require that explaining. It is fair to ask how the Anthonys ended up selecting that lawyer.\u201d<\/p>\n

Her final jab was aimed at the trial judge, and she claimed that he should \u201cbe disqualified\u201d because he gave an interview that could have \u201cnegatively affected the appeal rights of the defendant.\u201d<\/p>\n

Read more Happy 80th Birthday, Mr. President!<\/a><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

George Washington University law professor emerita W. Burlette Carter declared on Thursday that Karmelo Anthony was entitled to a new trial.Anthony, 19, was convicted of murder in the stabbing death of Austin Metcalf, 17, and sentenced to serve 35 years in prison. Carter argued that because \u201cminorities are not interchangeable,\u201d Anthony was not provided with \u201ca jury of his peers\u201d at trial \u2014 and she said that alone was grounds for him to receive a new trial.Carter, a black woman who describes herself on X as a \u201cdescendant of slaves,\u201d prefaced her statement by admitting that she had not yet read a full transcript of the trial \u2014 but then immediately argued that she didn\u2019t need to because it was already clear to her that Anthony had not been granted a fair trial.\u201cI have not yet read the full trial transcript. But so far, I do know this. Karmelo Anthony was entitled to a jury of his peers. He did not get that,\u201d she claimed. \u201cOn that ground alone, he is entitled to a new trial. Minorities are not interchangeable. The prosecutor\u2019s reported proffered reasons for striking all black jurors \u00a0\u2014 that they were teachers \u2014 appears to be pretext.\u201dBut by law, a jury does not have to reflect the race of the defendant \u2014 rather, it must be made up of a reasonable cross section of the community, and both attorneys and judges are to do their best to ensure that the jury is made up of individuals who will decide the case based on the facts presented rather than preexisting biases.The jury in Anthony\u2019s case was made up of multiple ethnic minorities \u2014 in spite of claims made by Anthony\u2019s father and others that the jury was \u201call white\u201d \u2014 including Asian, Indian, and Hispanic. The prosecution did challenge several potential jurors who were black because they were educators and the murder had happened on school grounds. The judge accepted those challenges as valid.\u201cAnthony needs a new lawyer on appeal and in a new trial,\u201d Carter continued, arguing that Anthony\u2019s court-appointed attorney had not done a good job. She left out the fact that, after raising some $600,000 via GiveSendGo, Anthony\u2019s family had gone with a court-appointed lawyer after claiming that he was unable to afford a private attorney.\u201cHis trial lawyer allowed in opinion evidence that should have been struck. He also seemed unable to appreciate and counter the impact of racial overtones in that case. Those overtones are clear even on Twitter commentary as folks seek to paint Metcalf as having no culpability in what happened and Karmelo as a complete monster,\u201d she insisted. \u201cThe facts on how the matter escalated are more complicated than that. He and they had no such authority. They are also apparent in the statements that seek to deputize Metcalf and other kids with authority to remove Anthony. They had none and initiated the conflict. That does not mean they should have been killed but it means they have explaining to do. The lawyer for Anthony apparently did not require that explaining. It is fair to ask how the Anthonys ended up selecting that lawyer.\u201dHer final jab was aimed at the trial judge, and she claimed that he should \u201cbe disqualified\u201d because he gave an interview that could have \u201cnegatively affected the appeal rights of the defendant.\u201d<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":289,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[3],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-290","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-news-2"],"yoast_head":"\nThe Flaw In A Professor\u2019s Race-Based Defense Of Karmelo Anthony - Blue Route Journal<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/blueroutejournal.com\/?p=290\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"The Flaw In A Professor\u2019s Race-Based Defense Of Karmelo Anthony - Blue Route Journal\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"George Washington University law professor emerita W. Burlette Carter declared on Thursday that Karmelo Anthony was entitled to a new trial.Anthony, 19, was convicted of murder in the stabbing death of Austin Metcalf, 17, and sentenced to serve 35 years in prison. Carter argued that because \u201cminorities are not interchangeable,\u201d Anthony was not provided with \u201ca jury of his peers\u201d at trial \u2014 and she said that alone was grounds for him to receive a new trial.Carter, a black woman who describes herself on X as a \u201cdescendant of slaves,\u201d prefaced her statement by admitting that she had not yet read a full transcript of the trial \u2014 but then immediately argued that she didn\u2019t need to because it was already clear to her that Anthony had not been granted a fair trial.\u201cI have not yet read the full trial transcript. But so far, I do know this. Karmelo Anthony was entitled to a jury of his peers. He did not get that,\u201d she claimed. \u201cOn that ground alone, he is entitled to a new trial. Minorities are not interchangeable. The prosecutor\u2019s reported proffered reasons for striking all black jurors \u00a0\u2014 that they were teachers \u2014 appears to be pretext.\u201dBut by law, a jury does not have to reflect the race of the defendant \u2014 rather, it must be made up of a reasonable cross section of the community, and both attorneys and judges are to do their best to ensure that the jury is made up of individuals who will decide the case based on the facts presented rather than preexisting biases.The jury in Anthony\u2019s case was made up of multiple ethnic minorities \u2014 in spite of claims made by Anthony\u2019s father and others that the jury was \u201call white\u201d \u2014 including Asian, Indian, and Hispanic. The prosecution did challenge several potential jurors who were black because they were educators and the murder had happened on school grounds. The judge accepted those challenges as valid.\u201cAnthony needs a new lawyer on appeal and in a new trial,\u201d Carter continued, arguing that Anthony\u2019s court-appointed attorney had not done a good job. She left out the fact that, after raising some $600,000 via GiveSendGo, Anthony\u2019s family had gone with a court-appointed lawyer after claiming that he was unable to afford a private attorney.\u201cHis trial lawyer allowed in opinion evidence that should have been struck. He also seemed unable to appreciate and counter the impact of racial overtones in that case. Those overtones are clear even on Twitter commentary as folks seek to paint Metcalf as having no culpability in what happened and Karmelo as a complete monster,\u201d she insisted. \u201cThe facts on how the matter escalated are more complicated than that. He and they had no such authority. They are also apparent in the statements that seek to deputize Metcalf and other kids with authority to remove Anthony. They had none and initiated the conflict. That does not mean they should have been killed but it means they have explaining to do. The lawyer for Anthony apparently did not require that explaining. It is fair to ask how the Anthonys ended up selecting that lawyer.\u201dHer final jab was aimed at the trial judge, and she claimed that he should \u201cbe disqualified\u201d because he gave an interview that could have \u201cnegatively affected the appeal rights of the defendant.\u201d\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/blueroutejournal.com\/?p=290\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Blue Route Journal\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2026-06-14T19:39:41+00:00\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blueroutejournal.com\\\/?p=290#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blueroutejournal.com\\\/?p=290\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blueroutejournal.com\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/19da116f8d79cf8987781569801c6b7c\"},\"headline\":\"The Flaw In A Professor\u2019s Race-Based Defense Of Karmelo Anthony\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-06-14T19:39:41+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blueroutejournal.com\\\/?p=290\"},\"wordCount\":609,\"commentCount\":0,\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blueroutejournal.com\\\/?p=290#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blueroutejournal.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/06\\\/41e6b2341487d1cdaa87918842b28e54.avif\",\"articleSection\":[\"News\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/blueroutejournal.com\\\/?p=290#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blueroutejournal.com\\\/?p=290\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blueroutejournal.com\\\/?p=290\",\"name\":\"The Flaw In A Professor\u2019s Race-Based Defense Of Karmelo Anthony - Blue Route Journal\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blueroutejournal.com\\\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blueroutejournal.com\\\/?p=290#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blueroutejournal.com\\\/?p=290#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blueroutejournal.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/06\\\/41e6b2341487d1cdaa87918842b28e54.avif\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-06-14T19:39:41+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blueroutejournal.com\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/19da116f8d79cf8987781569801c6b7c\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blueroutejournal.com\\\/?p=290#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/blueroutejournal.com\\\/?p=290\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blueroutejournal.com\\\/?p=290#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blueroutejournal.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/06\\\/41e6b2341487d1cdaa87918842b28e54.avif\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blueroutejournal.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/06\\\/41e6b2341487d1cdaa87918842b28e54.avif\",\"width\":1200,\"height\":675},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blueroutejournal.com\\\/?p=290#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blueroutejournal.com\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"The Flaw In A Professor\u2019s Race-Based Defense Of Karmelo Anthony\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blueroutejournal.com\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blueroutejournal.com\\\/\",\"name\":\"Blue Route Journal\",\"description\":\"\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blueroutejournal.com\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blueroutejournal.com\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/19da116f8d79cf8987781569801c6b7c\",\"name\":\"admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/50b1ad2e498f523425ee0a8cc5180a210646db1622662a3d56cc405d3e0c346a?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/50b1ad2e498f523425ee0a8cc5180a210646db1622662a3d56cc405d3e0c346a?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/50b1ad2e498f523425ee0a8cc5180a210646db1622662a3d56cc405d3e0c346a?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"http:\\\/\\\/blueroutejournal.com\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blueroutejournal.com\\\/?author=1\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"The Flaw In A Professor\u2019s Race-Based Defense Of Karmelo Anthony - Blue Route Journal","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/blueroutejournal.com\/?p=290","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"The Flaw In A Professor\u2019s Race-Based Defense Of Karmelo Anthony - Blue Route Journal","og_description":"George Washington University law professor emerita W. Burlette Carter declared on Thursday that Karmelo Anthony was entitled to a new trial.Anthony, 19, was convicted of murder in the stabbing death of Austin Metcalf, 17, and sentenced to serve 35 years in prison. Carter argued that because \u201cminorities are not interchangeable,\u201d Anthony was not provided with \u201ca jury of his peers\u201d at trial \u2014 and she said that alone was grounds for him to receive a new trial.Carter, a black woman who describes herself on X as a \u201cdescendant of slaves,\u201d prefaced her statement by admitting that she had not yet read a full transcript of the trial \u2014 but then immediately argued that she didn\u2019t need to because it was already clear to her that Anthony had not been granted a fair trial.\u201cI have not yet read the full trial transcript. But so far, I do know this. Karmelo Anthony was entitled to a jury of his peers. He did not get that,\u201d she claimed. \u201cOn that ground alone, he is entitled to a new trial. Minorities are not interchangeable. The prosecutor\u2019s reported proffered reasons for striking all black jurors \u00a0\u2014 that they were teachers \u2014 appears to be pretext.\u201dBut by law, a jury does not have to reflect the race of the defendant \u2014 rather, it must be made up of a reasonable cross section of the community, and both attorneys and judges are to do their best to ensure that the jury is made up of individuals who will decide the case based on the facts presented rather than preexisting biases.The jury in Anthony\u2019s case was made up of multiple ethnic minorities \u2014 in spite of claims made by Anthony\u2019s father and others that the jury was \u201call white\u201d \u2014 including Asian, Indian, and Hispanic. The prosecution did challenge several potential jurors who were black because they were educators and the murder had happened on school grounds. The judge accepted those challenges as valid.\u201cAnthony needs a new lawyer on appeal and in a new trial,\u201d Carter continued, arguing that Anthony\u2019s court-appointed attorney had not done a good job. She left out the fact that, after raising some $600,000 via GiveSendGo, Anthony\u2019s family had gone with a court-appointed lawyer after claiming that he was unable to afford a private attorney.\u201cHis trial lawyer allowed in opinion evidence that should have been struck. He also seemed unable to appreciate and counter the impact of racial overtones in that case. Those overtones are clear even on Twitter commentary as folks seek to paint Metcalf as having no culpability in what happened and Karmelo as a complete monster,\u201d she insisted. \u201cThe facts on how the matter escalated are more complicated than that. He and they had no such authority. They are also apparent in the statements that seek to deputize Metcalf and other kids with authority to remove Anthony. They had none and initiated the conflict. That does not mean they should have been killed but it means they have explaining to do. The lawyer for Anthony apparently did not require that explaining. It is fair to ask how the Anthonys ended up selecting that lawyer.\u201dHer final jab was aimed at the trial judge, and she claimed that he should \u201cbe disqualified\u201d because he gave an interview that could have \u201cnegatively affected the appeal rights of the defendant.\u201d","og_url":"https:\/\/blueroutejournal.com\/?p=290","og_site_name":"Blue Route Journal","article_published_time":"2026-06-14T19:39:41+00:00","author":"admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"admin","Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/blueroutejournal.com\/?p=290#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/blueroutejournal.com\/?p=290"},"author":{"name":"admin","@id":"https:\/\/blueroutejournal.com\/#\/schema\/person\/19da116f8d79cf8987781569801c6b7c"},"headline":"The Flaw In A Professor\u2019s Race-Based Defense Of Karmelo Anthony","datePublished":"2026-06-14T19:39:41+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/blueroutejournal.com\/?p=290"},"wordCount":609,"commentCount":0,"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/blueroutejournal.com\/?p=290#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/blueroutejournal.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/06\/41e6b2341487d1cdaa87918842b28e54.avif","articleSection":["News"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/blueroutejournal.com\/?p=290#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/blueroutejournal.com\/?p=290","url":"https:\/\/blueroutejournal.com\/?p=290","name":"The Flaw In A Professor\u2019s Race-Based Defense Of Karmelo Anthony - Blue Route Journal","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/blueroutejournal.com\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/blueroutejournal.com\/?p=290#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/blueroutejournal.com\/?p=290#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/blueroutejournal.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/06\/41e6b2341487d1cdaa87918842b28e54.avif","datePublished":"2026-06-14T19:39:41+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/blueroutejournal.com\/#\/schema\/person\/19da116f8d79cf8987781569801c6b7c"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/blueroutejournal.com\/?p=290#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/blueroutejournal.com\/?p=290"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/blueroutejournal.com\/?p=290#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/blueroutejournal.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/06\/41e6b2341487d1cdaa87918842b28e54.avif","contentUrl":"https:\/\/blueroutejournal.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/06\/41e6b2341487d1cdaa87918842b28e54.avif","width":1200,"height":675},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/blueroutejournal.com\/?p=290#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/blueroutejournal.com\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"The Flaw In A Professor\u2019s Race-Based Defense Of Karmelo Anthony"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/blueroutejournal.com\/#website","url":"https:\/\/blueroutejournal.com\/","name":"Blue Route Journal","description":"","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/blueroutejournal.com\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/blueroutejournal.com\/#\/schema\/person\/19da116f8d79cf8987781569801c6b7c","name":"admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/50b1ad2e498f523425ee0a8cc5180a210646db1622662a3d56cc405d3e0c346a?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/50b1ad2e498f523425ee0a8cc5180a210646db1622662a3d56cc405d3e0c346a?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/50b1ad2e498f523425ee0a8cc5180a210646db1622662a3d56cc405d3e0c346a?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"admin"},"sameAs":["http:\/\/blueroutejournal.com"],"url":"https:\/\/blueroutejournal.com\/?author=1"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/blueroutejournal.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/290","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/blueroutejournal.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/blueroutejournal.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blueroutejournal.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blueroutejournal.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=290"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/blueroutejournal.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/290\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blueroutejournal.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/289"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/blueroutejournal.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=290"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blueroutejournal.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=290"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blueroutejournal.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=290"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}