{"id":2805,"date":"2026-08-31T21:38:07","date_gmt":"2026-08-31T21:38:07","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/blueroutejournal.com\/?p=2805"},"modified":"2026-08-31T21:38:07","modified_gmt":"2026-08-31T21:38:07","slug":"supreme-court-drops-5-4-ruling-in-trump-ballroom-fight","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/blueroutejournal.com\/?p=2805","title":{"rendered":"Supreme Court Drops 5-4 Ruling In Trump Ballroom Fight"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n
\n

The U.S. Supreme Court on Monday cleared the way for President Donald Trump to move forward with construction of the White House ballroom.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n

Read more El-Sayed To Hire Token Jew As Campaign Spirals<\/a><\/p>\n

In an , the majority granted an emergency application from the Trump administration, blocking lower court rulings that would have halted work on the aboveground portion of the project. At this preliminary stage, the majority concluded the preservation groups who brought the lawsuit lacked standing to sue.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n

\u201cToday, we do not pass upon the legality of the government\u2019s East Wing project. We conclude only that, based on the submissions before us, the government is likely to prevail in showing that the Trust lacks Article III standing to challenge the project in federal court and that the remaining stay factors favor relief,\u201d the high court wrote.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n

Chief Justice John Roberts joined the court\u2019s liberal wing \u2014 Justices Sonia Sotomayor, Elena Kagan, and Ketanji Brown Jackson \u2014 in dissent. He argued that Congress has not delegated the president the authority to undergo such a project.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n

\u201cThat construction is likely unlawful,\u201d Roberts wrote. \u201cPursuant to its plenary constitutional authority over the District of Columbia and federal property, Congress has explicitly prohibited the construction of any \u201cbuilding or structure . . . on any reservation, park, or public grounds of the Federal Government in the District of Columbia without express authority of Congress.\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n

On Aug. 21, Roberts issued an<\/span> administrative stay<\/span>, temporarily blocking the federal district court\u2019s injunction while the full Supreme Court considered the Trump administration\u2019s emergency request. Monday\u2019s order marks a rare instance of Roberts in dissent as the conservative wing moves forward without him.<\/span><\/p>\n

\u201cThe White House is not just any building, and\u2014when it comes to historic preservation\u2014Hoagland is not just any person. In failing to appreciate as much, the Court misconceives the plaintiff\u2019s injury, allowing the Executive\u2019s likely infringement of the Legislature\u2019s power of the purse and authority to regulate federal property in the District of Columbia to continue,\u201d Roberts argued with the liberals.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n

Read more Trump Admin\u2019s War On Illegal Immigrant Truckers Intensifies<\/a><\/p>\n

\u201cToday\u2019s decision is no victory for the separation of powers,\u201d he added.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n

The split decision is a significant victory for the administration, which has argued that construction should be allowed to continue as the case moved through the courts, <\/span>The Daily Wire<\/span> reported.<\/span><\/p>\n

Solicitor General D. John Sauer <\/span>described<\/span> the project in a filing as an \u201cintegrated military complex\u201d that includes a secure ballroom space that is \u201cvitally required by national security.\u201d The administration has also argued that the White House requires additional security infrastructure, including facilities designed to protect the president and other officials from potential attacks.<\/span><\/p>\n

The National Trust for Historic Preservation, which brought the lawsuit against the administration, disagreed. The group argued that Trump cannot unilaterally demolish portions of the White House and construct a 90,000-square-foot addition without congressional authorization and other required reviews. The trust has accused the administration of attempting to \u201coutrun judicial review\u201d by moving construction forward as quickly as possible.<\/span><\/p>\n

The administration said in court filings that the project is already roughly 65% complete, with crews working 20 hours a day, seven days a week. About $200 million in private donations has reportedly already been spent or committed to the project. Trump first announced the ballroom project after returning to the White House, describing it as a roughly $400 million project financed primarily through private donations.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n

The administration subsequently demolished the White House\u2019s East Wing last year to clear the site.<\/span><\/p>\n

Read more Trump Warns Americans Are About To \u2018Kill The Golden Goose\u2019<\/a><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

The U.S. Supreme Court on Monday cleared the way for President Donald Trump to move forward with construction of the White House ballroom.\u00a0In an unsigned 5-4 order, the majority granted an emergency application from the Trump administration, blocking lower court rulings that would have halted work on the aboveground portion of the project. At this preliminary stage, the majority concluded the preservation groups who brought the lawsuit lacked standing to sue.\u00a0\u201cToday, we do not pass upon the legality of the government\u2019s East Wing project. We conclude only that, based on the submissions before us, the government is likely to prevail in showing that the Trust lacks Article III standing to challenge the project in federal court and that the remaining stay factors favor relief,\u201d the high court wrote.\u00a0Chief Justice John Roberts joined the court\u2019s liberal wing \u2014 Justices Sonia Sotomayor, Elena Kagan, and Ketanji Brown Jackson \u2014 in dissent. He argued that Congress has not delegated the president the authority to undergo such a project.\u00a0\u201cThat construction is likely unlawful,\u201d Roberts wrote. \u201cPursuant to its plenary constitutional authority over the District of Columbia and federal property, Congress has explicitly prohibited the construction of any \u201cbuilding or structure . . . on any reservation, park, or public grounds of the Federal Government in the District of Columbia without express authority of Congress.\u201dOn Aug. 21, Roberts issued an administrative stay, temporarily blocking the federal district court\u2019s injunction while the full Supreme Court considered the Trump administration\u2019s emergency request. Monday\u2019s order marks a rare instance of Roberts in dissent as the conservative wing moves forward without him.\u201cThe White House is not just any building, and\u2014when it comes to historic preservation\u2014Hoagland is not just any person. In failing to appreciate as much, the Court misconceives the plaintiff\u2019s injury, allowing the Executive\u2019s likely infringement of the Legislature\u2019s power of the purse and authority to regulate federal property in the District of Columbia to continue,\u201d Roberts argued with the liberals.\u00a0\u201cToday\u2019s decision is no victory for the separation of powers,\u201d he added.\u00a0The split decision is a significant victory for the administration, which has argued that construction should be allowed to continue as the case moved through the courts, The Daily Wire reported.Solicitor General D. John Sauer described the project in a filing as an \u201cintegrated military complex\u201d that includes a secure ballroom space that is \u201cvitally required by national security.\u201d The administration has also argued that the White House requires additional security infrastructure, including facilities designed to protect the president and other officials from potential attacks.The National Trust for Historic Preservation, which brought the lawsuit against the administration, disagreed. The group argued that Trump cannot unilaterally demolish portions of the White House and construct a 90,000-square-foot addition without congressional authorization and other required reviews. The trust has accused the administration of attempting to \u201coutrun judicial review\u201d by moving construction forward as quickly as possible.The administration said in court filings that the project is already roughly 65% complete, with crews working 20 hours a day, seven days a week. About $200 million in private donations has reportedly already been spent or committed to the project. Trump first announced the ballroom project after returning to the White House, describing it as a roughly $400 million project financed primarily through private donations.\u00a0The administration subsequently demolished the White House\u2019s East Wing last year to clear the site.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":2804,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[3],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-2805","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-news-2"],"yoast_head":"\nSupreme Court Drops 5-4 Ruling In Trump Ballroom Fight - Blue Route Journal<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/blueroutejournal.com\/?p=2805\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Supreme Court Drops 5-4 Ruling In Trump Ballroom Fight - Blue Route Journal\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"The U.S. Supreme Court on Monday cleared the way for President Donald Trump to move forward with construction of the White House ballroom.\u00a0In an unsigned 5-4 order, the majority granted an emergency application from the Trump administration, blocking lower court rulings that would have halted work on the aboveground portion of the project. At this preliminary stage, the majority concluded the preservation groups who brought the lawsuit lacked standing to sue.\u00a0\u201cToday, we do not pass upon the legality of the government\u2019s East Wing project. We conclude only that, based on the submissions before us, the government is likely to prevail in showing that the Trust lacks Article III standing to challenge the project in federal court and that the remaining stay factors favor relief,\u201d the high court wrote.\u00a0Chief Justice John Roberts joined the court\u2019s liberal wing \u2014 Justices Sonia Sotomayor, Elena Kagan, and Ketanji Brown Jackson \u2014 in dissent. He argued that Congress has not delegated the president the authority to undergo such a project.\u00a0\u201cThat construction is likely unlawful,\u201d Roberts wrote. \u201cPursuant to its plenary constitutional authority over the District of Columbia and federal property, Congress has explicitly prohibited the construction of any \u201cbuilding or structure . . . on any reservation, park, or public grounds of the Federal Government in the District of Columbia without express authority of Congress.\u201dOn Aug. 21, Roberts issued an administrative stay, temporarily blocking the federal district court\u2019s injunction while the full Supreme Court considered the Trump administration\u2019s emergency request. Monday\u2019s order marks a rare instance of Roberts in dissent as the conservative wing moves forward without him.\u201cThe White House is not just any building, and\u2014when it comes to historic preservation\u2014Hoagland is not just any person. In failing to appreciate as much, the Court misconceives the plaintiff\u2019s injury, allowing the Executive\u2019s likely infringement of the Legislature\u2019s power of the purse and authority to regulate federal property in the District of Columbia to continue,\u201d Roberts argued with the liberals.\u00a0\u201cToday\u2019s decision is no victory for the separation of powers,\u201d he added.\u00a0The split decision is a significant victory for the administration, which has argued that construction should be allowed to continue as the case moved through the courts, The Daily Wire reported.Solicitor General D. John Sauer described the project in a filing as an \u201cintegrated military complex\u201d that includes a secure ballroom space that is \u201cvitally required by national security.\u201d The administration has also argued that the White House requires additional security infrastructure, including facilities designed to protect the president and other officials from potential attacks.The National Trust for Historic Preservation, which brought the lawsuit against the administration, disagreed. The group argued that Trump cannot unilaterally demolish portions of the White House and construct a 90,000-square-foot addition without congressional authorization and other required reviews. The trust has accused the administration of attempting to \u201coutrun judicial review\u201d by moving construction forward as quickly as possible.The administration said in court filings that the project is already roughly 65% complete, with crews working 20 hours a day, seven days a week. About $200 million in private donations has reportedly already been spent or committed to the project. Trump first announced the ballroom project after returning to the White House, describing it as a roughly $400 million project financed primarily through private donations.\u00a0The administration subsequently demolished the White House\u2019s East Wing last year to clear the site.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/blueroutejournal.com\/?p=2805\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Blue Route Journal\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2026-08-31T21:38:07+00:00\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blueroutejournal.com\\\/?p=2805#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blueroutejournal.com\\\/?p=2805\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blueroutejournal.com\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/19da116f8d79cf8987781569801c6b7c\"},\"headline\":\"Supreme Court Drops 5-4 Ruling In Trump Ballroom Fight\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-08-31T21:38:07+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blueroutejournal.com\\\/?p=2805\"},\"wordCount\":609,\"commentCount\":0,\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blueroutejournal.com\\\/?p=2805#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blueroutejournal.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/08\\\/91ca9822825096c23936ee8bbd90c361.avif\",\"articleSection\":[\"News\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/blueroutejournal.com\\\/?p=2805#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blueroutejournal.com\\\/?p=2805\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blueroutejournal.com\\\/?p=2805\",\"name\":\"Supreme Court Drops 5-4 Ruling In Trump Ballroom Fight - Blue Route Journal\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blueroutejournal.com\\\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blueroutejournal.com\\\/?p=2805#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blueroutejournal.com\\\/?p=2805#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blueroutejournal.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/08\\\/91ca9822825096c23936ee8bbd90c361.avif\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-08-31T21:38:07+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blueroutejournal.com\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/19da116f8d79cf8987781569801c6b7c\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blueroutejournal.com\\\/?p=2805#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/blueroutejournal.com\\\/?p=2805\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blueroutejournal.com\\\/?p=2805#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blueroutejournal.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/08\\\/91ca9822825096c23936ee8bbd90c361.avif\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blueroutejournal.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/08\\\/91ca9822825096c23936ee8bbd90c361.avif\",\"width\":1200,\"height\":675},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blueroutejournal.com\\\/?p=2805#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blueroutejournal.com\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Supreme Court Drops 5-4 Ruling In Trump Ballroom Fight\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blueroutejournal.com\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blueroutejournal.com\\\/\",\"name\":\"Blue Route Journal\",\"description\":\"\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blueroutejournal.com\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blueroutejournal.com\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/19da116f8d79cf8987781569801c6b7c\",\"name\":\"admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/50b1ad2e498f523425ee0a8cc5180a210646db1622662a3d56cc405d3e0c346a?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/50b1ad2e498f523425ee0a8cc5180a210646db1622662a3d56cc405d3e0c346a?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/50b1ad2e498f523425ee0a8cc5180a210646db1622662a3d56cc405d3e0c346a?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"http:\\\/\\\/blueroutejournal.com\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blueroutejournal.com\\\/?author=1\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Supreme Court Drops 5-4 Ruling In Trump Ballroom Fight - Blue Route Journal","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/blueroutejournal.com\/?p=2805","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Supreme Court Drops 5-4 Ruling In Trump Ballroom Fight - Blue Route Journal","og_description":"The U.S. Supreme Court on Monday cleared the way for President Donald Trump to move forward with construction of the White House ballroom.\u00a0In an unsigned 5-4 order, the majority granted an emergency application from the Trump administration, blocking lower court rulings that would have halted work on the aboveground portion of the project. At this preliminary stage, the majority concluded the preservation groups who brought the lawsuit lacked standing to sue.\u00a0\u201cToday, we do not pass upon the legality of the government\u2019s East Wing project. We conclude only that, based on the submissions before us, the government is likely to prevail in showing that the Trust lacks Article III standing to challenge the project in federal court and that the remaining stay factors favor relief,\u201d the high court wrote.\u00a0Chief Justice John Roberts joined the court\u2019s liberal wing \u2014 Justices Sonia Sotomayor, Elena Kagan, and Ketanji Brown Jackson \u2014 in dissent. He argued that Congress has not delegated the president the authority to undergo such a project.\u00a0\u201cThat construction is likely unlawful,\u201d Roberts wrote. \u201cPursuant to its plenary constitutional authority over the District of Columbia and federal property, Congress has explicitly prohibited the construction of any \u201cbuilding or structure . . . on any reservation, park, or public grounds of the Federal Government in the District of Columbia without express authority of Congress.\u201dOn Aug. 21, Roberts issued an administrative stay, temporarily blocking the federal district court\u2019s injunction while the full Supreme Court considered the Trump administration\u2019s emergency request. Monday\u2019s order marks a rare instance of Roberts in dissent as the conservative wing moves forward without him.\u201cThe White House is not just any building, and\u2014when it comes to historic preservation\u2014Hoagland is not just any person. In failing to appreciate as much, the Court misconceives the plaintiff\u2019s injury, allowing the Executive\u2019s likely infringement of the Legislature\u2019s power of the purse and authority to regulate federal property in the District of Columbia to continue,\u201d Roberts argued with the liberals.\u00a0\u201cToday\u2019s decision is no victory for the separation of powers,\u201d he added.\u00a0The split decision is a significant victory for the administration, which has argued that construction should be allowed to continue as the case moved through the courts, The Daily Wire reported.Solicitor General D. John Sauer described the project in a filing as an \u201cintegrated military complex\u201d that includes a secure ballroom space that is \u201cvitally required by national security.\u201d The administration has also argued that the White House requires additional security infrastructure, including facilities designed to protect the president and other officials from potential attacks.The National Trust for Historic Preservation, which brought the lawsuit against the administration, disagreed. The group argued that Trump cannot unilaterally demolish portions of the White House and construct a 90,000-square-foot addition without congressional authorization and other required reviews. The trust has accused the administration of attempting to \u201coutrun judicial review\u201d by moving construction forward as quickly as possible.The administration said in court filings that the project is already roughly 65% complete, with crews working 20 hours a day, seven days a week. About $200 million in private donations has reportedly already been spent or committed to the project. Trump first announced the ballroom project after returning to the White House, describing it as a roughly $400 million project financed primarily through private donations.\u00a0The administration subsequently demolished the White House\u2019s East Wing last year to clear the site.","og_url":"https:\/\/blueroutejournal.com\/?p=2805","og_site_name":"Blue Route Journal","article_published_time":"2026-08-31T21:38:07+00:00","author":"admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"admin","Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/blueroutejournal.com\/?p=2805#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/blueroutejournal.com\/?p=2805"},"author":{"name":"admin","@id":"https:\/\/blueroutejournal.com\/#\/schema\/person\/19da116f8d79cf8987781569801c6b7c"},"headline":"Supreme Court Drops 5-4 Ruling In Trump Ballroom Fight","datePublished":"2026-08-31T21:38:07+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/blueroutejournal.com\/?p=2805"},"wordCount":609,"commentCount":0,"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/blueroutejournal.com\/?p=2805#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/blueroutejournal.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/08\/91ca9822825096c23936ee8bbd90c361.avif","articleSection":["News"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/blueroutejournal.com\/?p=2805#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/blueroutejournal.com\/?p=2805","url":"https:\/\/blueroutejournal.com\/?p=2805","name":"Supreme Court Drops 5-4 Ruling In Trump Ballroom Fight - Blue Route Journal","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/blueroutejournal.com\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/blueroutejournal.com\/?p=2805#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/blueroutejournal.com\/?p=2805#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/blueroutejournal.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/08\/91ca9822825096c23936ee8bbd90c361.avif","datePublished":"2026-08-31T21:38:07+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/blueroutejournal.com\/#\/schema\/person\/19da116f8d79cf8987781569801c6b7c"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/blueroutejournal.com\/?p=2805#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/blueroutejournal.com\/?p=2805"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/blueroutejournal.com\/?p=2805#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/blueroutejournal.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/08\/91ca9822825096c23936ee8bbd90c361.avif","contentUrl":"https:\/\/blueroutejournal.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/08\/91ca9822825096c23936ee8bbd90c361.avif","width":1200,"height":675},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/blueroutejournal.com\/?p=2805#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/blueroutejournal.com\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Supreme Court Drops 5-4 Ruling In Trump Ballroom Fight"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/blueroutejournal.com\/#website","url":"https:\/\/blueroutejournal.com\/","name":"Blue Route Journal","description":"","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/blueroutejournal.com\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/blueroutejournal.com\/#\/schema\/person\/19da116f8d79cf8987781569801c6b7c","name":"admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/50b1ad2e498f523425ee0a8cc5180a210646db1622662a3d56cc405d3e0c346a?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/50b1ad2e498f523425ee0a8cc5180a210646db1622662a3d56cc405d3e0c346a?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/50b1ad2e498f523425ee0a8cc5180a210646db1622662a3d56cc405d3e0c346a?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"admin"},"sameAs":["http:\/\/blueroutejournal.com"],"url":"https:\/\/blueroutejournal.com\/?author=1"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/blueroutejournal.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2805","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/blueroutejournal.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/blueroutejournal.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blueroutejournal.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blueroutejournal.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=2805"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/blueroutejournal.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2805\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blueroutejournal.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/2804"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/blueroutejournal.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=2805"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blueroutejournal.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=2805"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blueroutejournal.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=2805"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}